Give the function the inputs , and , and the outputs are , and . Near some excluded inputs a rational function runs away like this, while near others it stays calm and the graph only loses a single point. One factorization tells the two cases apart, and the difference shapes the whole graph.
Key terms
One-sided unbounded behavior
Definition Let be defined on an open interval for some . The statement
means that for every number there is a number with such that whenever . The statement as means the same with in place of . For the left side, written , use an interval and the inputs with . In limit notation these statements read , and so on.
In plain words As creeps toward from one side, the outputs eventually pass any bound you name and stay past it. Each side is checked on its own, and the two sides can head in different directions.
Example Here are some values of .
The table only suggests the pattern. To prove the right side, take any , which is enough because a that works for also works for every smaller bound. If , then , and so . Thus as . The same argument with the signs reversed gives as .
Vertical asymptote
Definition The line is a vertical asymptote of the graph of if at least one of the following four statements is true.
For a rational function, is then an excluded value, so the graph never meets the line .
In plain words Near the line the graph runs up or down along it without bound, on at least one side. The line is a guide for the eye, not part of the graph.
Example For the numerator is always , while the denominator is a tiny positive number just to the right of and a tiny negative number just to the left. So as and as , and the line is a vertical asymptote. For instance and .
Denominator zero after cancellation
Definition Let be a rational function with reduced form , so that and share no factor of positive degree. If for a real number , then , because otherwise would be a common factor. Near the numerator stays close to the nonzero number while the denominator approaches . The denominator has only finitely many zeros, so it keeps one sign just left of and one sign just right of . Hence on each side of the values tend to or to , and is a vertical asymptote. If , the values approach the finite number and there is no vertical asymptote at . So the vertical asymptotes of are exactly the lines where is a real zero of the reduced denominator .
In plain words Cancel first, then look at the bottom. A zero that survives the cancellation gives a vertical asymptote, and a zero that cancels away does not.
Example Take
The original domain excludes and . After cancelling the reduced form is , whose denominator is zero only at . So is the only vertical asymptote. Near the numerator is close to while the denominator shrinks, and indeed and .
Removable hole
Definition With the same notation, let be excluded from the domain of while . Then the graph of has a removable hole at the point
The values of stay bounded near and approach the height of the hole from both sides. A vertical asymptote and a hole can never occur at the same , since one needs and the other needs .
In plain words At a hole the graph is calm on both sides and only one point is missing. At a vertical asymptote the graph runs off the page.
Example The function above has a hole at , at the height . The values near , rounded to four decimals, settle toward from both sides.
| undefined |
Compare them with the values next to , which are in the hundreds. The hole is the point .
Sign analysis near an excluded value
Definition Let be a vertical asymptote of and write its reduced form as
where is the multiplicity of as a zero of and . Polynomials have no jumps, so and keep the signs of and on a small interval around . On that interval the sign of is the sign of times the sign of .
- If is odd, the factor is negative to the left of and positive to the right, so the two sides go in opposite directions, one toward and the other toward .
- If is even, the factor is positive on both sides, so both sides go toward when and both go toward when .
In plain words Close to the asymptote only the signs matter. Find the sign of each factor just left and just right of , multiply them, and the result tells you whether that side of the graph shoots up or down.
Example In the reduced form of the numerator is positive near , and is a zero of multiplicity of the denominator. Just left of the denominator is negative, so as . Just right of it is positive, so as . For an even case take
Near the numerator is close to and the denominator is positive on both sides, so as and as . For instance and .
Infinity is not a function value
Definition The symbols and do not stand for real numbers. The statement as describes the values of at inputs near and says nothing about . At a vertical asymptote of a rational function, is not in the domain, so is undefined, and writing or is incorrect. A one-sided limit that equals or does not exist as a real number, and the notation only records the way in which it fails to exist.
In plain words Infinity is a direction the outputs head in, not a number they reach or a number you can plug in. At the asymptote the function simply has no value.
Example Let . Every output is a positive real number, and is undefined. Still as from either side, which means for instance that whenever , since then . The range of is the interval , which contains no number called .
Check yourself
- Find the vertical asymptotes and the holes of the function below.
Show the answer
Factoring gives
so the original domain excludes and . The reduced form is , whose denominator is zero at , so is a vertical asymptote. The factor cancels completely and the reduced form equals at , so the graph has a hole at .
- Describe the behavior of the function below on both sides of each vertical asymptote.
Show the answer
The numerator is not zero at or at , so nothing cancels and both and are vertical asymptotes. Near the numerator is close to and is close to , so has the sign of . Hence as and as . Near the numerator is close to , the factor is close to and is positive, so on both sides of .
- A classmate says that the function below has a hole at because its numerator is there. Is that right?
Show the answer
No. Cancelling one factor gives , and the reduced denominator is still at . So is a vertical asymptote. The reduced numerator is close to there, so as and as .