Type the formula
into a graphing tool and you see what looks like a straight line. Put in and the formula breaks down into . Both observations are right. Near the outputs crowd around , and at there is no output at all. A limit describes exactly this difference between near a point and at a point.
Key terms
Nearby inputs
Definition For a number and a radius , the inputs within of other than itself are the numbers with
which form the open interval from to with removed. Let be defined at all of these inputs for some . We say that approaches the number as approaches , and write
if the outputs can be made as close to as we like by taking close enough to with . Precisely, for every there is a such that every input with gives . So the limit depends only on the values of at nearby inputs, never on and never on values far from .
In plain words To find a limit at , look only at inputs close to on both sides and ignore itself. Then ask which single number the outputs crowd around.
Example The function from the opening is undefined at and defined everywhere else. Since , it equals for every .
In fact for every , so taking works for every tolerance. The limit is .
Function value versus limiting value
Definition The function value is the output at the single input , when is in the domain. The limiting value is the limit of as approaches , when that limit exists. Either one can exist without the other, and when both exist they can differ. When both exist and are equal, the graph has no break at , and calculus calls continuous at .
In plain words The value is where the function is at . The limit is where it is heading as closes in on . Often they agree, but nothing forces them to.
Example All three functions below agree with at every input except possibly , so all three have limit at .
| Function | Value at | Limit at |
|---|---|---|
| for every | ||
| for , undefined at | undefined | |
| for , and at |
The three graphs are the full parabola, the parabola with a hole at , and the parabola with that point moved up to .
Left and right approach
Definition The left-hand limit
means that approaches as approaches through inputs only. The right-hand limit, written with , uses inputs only. Each one needs to be defined on an open interval just to that side of . The two-sided limit exists and equals exactly when both one-sided limits exist and both equal .
In plain words Walk toward from the left and see where the outputs head, then do the same from the right. There is a two-sided limit only when both trips end at the same height.
Example Take the piecewise function
| From the left | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| From the right | |||
|---|---|---|---|
The left-hand limit is and the right-hand limit is . They differ, so the two-sided limit at does not exist, even though is defined.
Numerical tables
Definition A numerical table for a limit at lists at inputs that approach from both sides, such as , and , and never at itself. Outputs that close in on one number from both sides suggest the limit. A calculator or computer rounds every number to a fixed count of digits, so at inputs extremely close to , subtracting two nearly equal numbers can wipe out the correct digits.
In plain words Come at from both sides in shrinking steps and watch the outputs. Stop before the inputs get so close that rounding takes over.
Example Here is a table for the function below near .
The outputs close in on about , which suggests . Multiplying by the conjugate confirms it. For with ,
which approaches . Push the table too far, though, and a computer that keeps about 16 significant digits reports and . Those numbers come from rounding, not from the function.
Graph window
Definition A graph window, also called a viewing window, is the rectangle of the plane that a graphing tool shows, with from to and from to . The tool computes at finitely many sample inputs and joins the dots. So the picture can hide a hole or a single moved point, it can draw a false steep segment across a vertical asymptote, and it can turn fast oscillation into a pattern that is not there. A window centered at with half-width and half-height pictures the limit condition. If every point of the graph with lies strictly between the top and bottom edges, then those inputs give .
In plain words Zoom in around the point where you expect the limit. If the curve crosses the window from its left edge to its right edge without escaping out the top or bottom, the outputs near stay near . Whatever the screen does not draw, it cannot show you.
Example In the window with and the graph of the opening function looks like the whole line . The missing point is a single point, far too small for any screen, and only the formula tells you it is missing. Now zoom to and . The graph runs diagonally from the lower left corner to the upper right corner and never leaves through the top or bottom, which matches the limit .
Nonexistence
Definition The limit of at does not exist when no single real number meets the definition. There are three common ways this happens. In a jump, both one-sided limits exist but they differ. In unbounded behavior, the outputs on at least one side grow past every bound in size. In oscillation, there are two numbers such that every interval around , however small, contains inputs with and inputs with . When the outputs grow without bound through positive values on both sides we write , but this only describes how the limit fails, since is not a real number. A two-sided limit also needs to be defined at nearby inputs on both sides, so at an endpoint of the domain only a one-sided limit can make sense.
In plain words A limit fails when the two sides disagree, when the outputs blow up, or when they keep swinging and never settle.
Example Three functions show the three failures at one point each.
- The function equals for every and for every . That is a jump, so there is no limit at .
- The function gives at both and and grows past every bound as approaches . Its graph has the vertical asymptote , and there is no real limit.
- The function equals at and at for every positive whole number . Both kinds of input come as close to as we like, so with and the outputs oscillate and there is no limit at .
Evidence versus proof
Definition A table checks only finitely many inputs, and a graph shows only what its window and its sampling allow. Both give evidence and a good guess, never a proof. A proof is an argument that covers every input in some interval around with removed, usually algebra that rewrites for in a form whose behavior near is clear, or an inequality that bounds .
In plain words Use tables and graphs to guess. Then confirm the guess with an argument that works for all inputs near , not just the ones you tried.
Example Consider the function below near .
It is even, so negative inputs give the same outputs as positive ones.
The table points to , but the limit is . For every the denominator is larger than , so
and the right side gets as small as we like as approaches . Inputs closer to than the table went show the drop, with and .
Check yourself
- Make a table for the function below with , , and , guess its limit at , and then confirm the guess with algebra.
Show the answer
The table gives , , and , which suggests . Since , the function equals for every , and approaches . The limit is .
- Let for , for and . Find both one-sided limits at , the two-sided limit and .
Show the answer
From the left the outputs approach , and from the right they approach . Both one-sided limits are , so the two-sided limit is . The value is , which is different.
- For a table at , and gives exactly every time. Does the limit at exist?
Show the answer
No. Those inputs make a whole multiple of , where the sine is . At the function equals , and at it equals , for every positive whole number . These inputs come arbitrarily close to , so the outputs oscillate and there is no limit.