A cubic like has no obvious factoring pattern, and guessing zeros at random could take forever. Its coefficients, though, already narrow things down. If it has a rational zero, written as a reduced fraction, the numerator must divide and the denominator must divide . That leaves a short list to check, and the Factor Theorem does the rest.
Key terms
Reduced fraction
Definition A rational number is a number of the form with integers and and . The fraction is in lowest terms, or reduced, when and and have no common positive divisor other than . Every rational number has exactly one such reduced form. An integer has the reduced form .
In plain words Cancel every common factor and keep the minus sign in the numerator. What is left is the one standard way to write that number.
Example The fraction reduces to , the fraction reduces to , and the integer is .
The Rational Zeros Theorem
Definition Let
have integer coefficients, with , and . If the reduced fraction is a zero of , then divides and divides .
The reason fits in a few lines. Multiplying by gives
Every term except the last contains the factor , so divides . Since and have no common prime factor, neither do and , so divides . In the same way every term except the first contains , so divides and therefore .
In plain words A rational zero cannot be just any fraction. Its numerator must divide the constant term and its denominator must divide the leading coefficient. The fraction has to be reduced first, or the test says nothing.
Example The polynomial has the zeros and . In reduced form the numerators and divide , and the denominators and divide , as promised. Written as , the same zero has numerator , which does not divide . That is no contradiction, because is not reduced.
Factors of the constant and leading coefficients
Definition For integers and , the number divides when for some integer . For the theorem you need all divisors of the constant term and of the leading coefficient . A nonzero integer has finitely many divisors, and they come in pairs where runs through the positive divisors of . Two cases need a step first.
- If , then is a factor. Write with and apply the theorem to .
- If every coefficient is rational but some are not integers, multiply by a common denominator of the coefficients. This gives a polynomial with integer coefficients and the same zeros.
In plain words List the positive divisors of the last coefficient and of the first coefficient. Signs are handled once, at the end, with a in front of each candidate.
Example For the constant term has positive divisors , and the leading coefficient has positive divisors . For the constant term is , so first write it as and work with .
Rational root candidates
Definition Under the hypotheses of the theorem, the rational root candidates of are all numbers
with repeated values listed once. Every rational zero of is on this list. The list is finite.
In plain words Form every fraction with a numerator from the first list and a denominator from the second, put in front, and cross out duplicates.
Example For , the denominator gives . The denominator gives , and only and are new. So there are twelve candidates,
Testing candidates
Definition A candidate is a zero of exactly when . By the Remainder Theorem this is the same as the remainder of divided by being , so either direct evaluation or synthetic division decides it. Two values are quick to get. The value is the sum of the coefficients, and is the same sum after switching the sign of each coefficient of an odd power of .
In plain words Try the candidates one by one and stop at the first one that gives zero. Start with the easy ones.
Example For ,
| Candidate | Value of | Zero? |
|---|---|---|
| no | ||
| no | ||
| yes |
So is a zero and is a factor.
Synthetic division and the depressed polynomial
Definition Synthetic division divides by using the coefficients alone, with for each missing power. Bring down the leading coefficient, then repeatedly multiply the newest bottom entry by and add the product to the next coefficient. The last bottom entry is the remainder , and the entries before it are the coefficients of the quotient. When is a zero the remainder is , so
where the quotient , called the depressed polynomial, has degree one less than . The remaining zeros of are exactly the zeros of , so the search continues on . Every rational zero of is also a rational zero of , so it is already on the list for , and candidates that failed for can be skipped. A zero can repeat, so test itself again on . When reaches degree , finish with factoring or the quadratic formula.
In plain words Each zero you find shrinks the problem by one degree. Keep dividing until a quadratic is left.
Example Continue with and the zero .
The quotient is , so
and the zeros are , and .
A repeated zero shows up when the same candidate works twice. For the candidate works, and the quotient is . The candidate works again on that quotient, leaving . So
The theorem gives candidates, not all roots
Definition The Rational Zeros Theorem says only that every rational zero is on the candidate list. It does not say that any candidate is a zero, and it says nothing about zeros that are irrational or not real. A polynomial with integer coefficients may have no rational zeros at all, even when it has real zeros.
In plain words The list is a set of suspects, not a list of answers. When it runs out, the remaining zeros have to come from the quadratic formula, from a graph or from a numerical method.
Example For the candidates are , and only works. Dividing by leaves , whose zeros are
These two zeros are irrational, so they were never on the list. As another case, the only candidates for are and , and none of them is a zero. So has no rational zeros, which proves that is irrational.
Check yourself
- List the rational root candidates of .
Show the answer
The positive divisors of are and those of are . The twelve candidates are
- Factor completely.
Show the answer
The sum of the coefficients is , so is a zero. Synthetic division by gives the quotient , so
- Explain why has no rational zeros, even though it has a real zero.
Show the answer
The only candidates are and , and and are not zero. Since and the graph of a polynomial has no breaks, it crosses the -axis between and . That real zero is irrational.