On a line you can approach a point from only two sides. In the plane you can come in along any line, along a parabola, or spiraling inward, and a function may behave differently on each route. A limit in several variables has to account for all of them at once. The way to do that is to stop thinking about routes and measure only distance.
Key terms
The epsilon-delta definition using distance
Definition Let be a function with domain , and let be a point such that every open disk about contains points of other than itself. Such a point is called a limit point of , and it need not belong to . We write
if for every there is a such that for every in with
For three variables replace the distance by . When the limit exists it is unique.
In plain words However thin an output band around you choose, there is a small disk around the input point such that every allowed input inside it, other than the center, lands in that band.
Example To prove that as , write for the distance from to . Each of and is at most , so
Given , choose . Then gives .
All approaches
Definition The definition controls every point of within distance , regardless of how it was reached. Consequently, if the limit of at is and is any subset of that has as a limit point, the limit of restricted to is also . In particular, if is a curve with and for near , , and as , then
In plain words A true limit is the same along every road into the point, straight or curved, fast or slow.
Example The limit of at the origin is , since is the squared distance. Along the spiral with , which circles the origin infinitely often, the values are , and these tend to as the definition promises.
Path tests can disprove a limit
Definition Suppose and are two paths in that approach , each having as a limit point, for example curves in that tend to without passing through it. If along and along with , then the limit of at does not exist. The same conclusion holds if the limit along a single path fails to exist.
In plain words One road gives one answer and another road gives a different answer, so there is no single answer.
Example Let
Along the line with ,
Along the -axis () the values are , and along () they are . So the limit at the origin does not exist.
Agreeing paths do not prove a limit
Definition Finding the same limit along some paths, even along every line through , does not show that the limit is . A path test can only disprove. To prove a limit you need an argument that covers every point of near at once, such as the definition, a squeeze estimate or continuity.
In plain words Checking a thousand roads still leaves infinitely many unchecked, and the bad one might be curved.
Example Consider
Along the -axis . Along a line , including the -axis ,
So every line through the origin gives . But along the parabola ,
The limit at the origin does not exist.
Squeeze estimates
Definition Let be as in the definition of a limit. If there is a function with
for all in in some punctured disk about , and as , then . The most useful bounds are functions of the distance alone, built from the inequalities and .
In plain words Trap the error between and something you know shrinks to . A bound in terms of distance alone works for every approach at once.
Example Let
Since , the fraction is at most , so . As the bound goes to , so the limit is . In epsilon-delta form, works.
Continuity relative to a domain
Definition Let have domain and let be a point of . The function is continuous at if for every there is a such that for every in with . Only points of are tested, so at a boundary point of that belongs to the inputs come from inside only. If is an isolated point of , meaning a point of that is not a limit point of , then a small enough disk contains no other point of and is automatically continuous there. When is a limit point of the definition says exactly that
The function is continuous on if it is continuous at every point of . Sums, differences and products of continuous functions are continuous, quotients are continuous where the denominator is not zero, and if is continuous at and a function of one variable is continuous at , then the composition is continuous at . So polynomials in and are continuous on , and rational functions are continuous on their domains.
In plain words A continuous function has no jumps or holes within its own domain, and its limit at each such point is simply its value there.
Example The function is built from continuous pieces and is continuous wherever and , which includes . So its limit there is found by substitution,
The function is continuous on its domain, the closed unit disk, including the boundary circle, where only inputs from the disk count. In contrast, setting for gives a function on all of that is not continuous at the origin, because its limit there does not exist.
Check yourself
- Show that the limit of as does not exist.
Show the answer
Along the -axis the function equals , and along the -axis it equals . Two paths give different limits, so the limit does not exist.
- Find the limit of as .
Show the answer
Let . Each of , , is at most , so and
The bound tends to , so the limit is by the squeeze estimate.
- Let for . Which value of makes continuous on ?
Show the answer
Away from the origin is a rational function with nonzero denominator, so it is continuous there. At the origin, , so the limit is . Setting makes continuous everywhere.