The unit circle is not the graph of one function, yet near the point a small arc of it is the graph of . Near no such description works, because the circle turns vertical there. The implicit function theorem gives a simple test that guarantees the first kind of behavior, using one partial derivative at that point. The inverse function theorem answers the same kind of question for maps that send points to points.
Key terms
C1 regularity on a neighborhood
Definition Let be an open subset of and . The map is of class on when every first partial derivative of every component of exists at every point of and is continuous on . A map is near a point when it is on some open set containing . Such a map is differentiable at every point of , and its derivative is the Jacobian matrix .
In plain words The function has partial derivatives everywhere in a small open region around the point, and they change continuously. Both theorems in this lesson need this on a whole neighborhood, not only at one point.
Example Every polynomial, such as , is on all of . The function is continuous everywhere, but does not exist at any point with , so is not on any open set that meets the -axis.
Implicit equations
Definition An implicit equation is an equation , where is defined on an open set of with values in , and . It is a system of scalar equations in unknowns. Its solution set is the set of all points with , and the question is whether the variables can be regarded as functions of the variables on that set.
In plain words You have as many equations as unknowns you want to solve for, plus some leftover variables that are free to move. The equations tie the unknowns to the free variables without handing you a formula.
Example The single equation has free variables and unknown . The point lies on it, since . The pair of equations
has free variables and unknowns , and satisfies both.
Local solvability
Definition Let . The equation is locally solvable for near when there are open sets in and in and a function with such that, for in ,
The function is called a local branch of the solution set through .
In plain words Inside a small box around the point, the solution set is exactly the graph of one function. Points of the solution set outside the box do not matter.
Example For near , take , and . Near there is no local branch , because for slightly less than every box around the point contains the two solutions , and for slightly more than it contains none.
The implicit function theorem
Definition Let be open, let be on , and let be a point of with . Write for the matrix of partial derivatives of the components of with respect to . If
then there are open sets and with and a unique function with such that with in holds exactly when . Moreover is on , and can be chosen so small that is invertible for every in . For one equation () the condition is simply that the relevant partial derivative is nonzero, for example when solving for .
In plain words Three things are needed. The function is near the point, the point solves the equation, and the derivative with respect to the unknowns you want is invertible there. Then the solution set near the point is the graph of a smooth function, even if you can never write it down.
Example Take at . It is a polynomial, so it is on , and . Since
the theorem gives a function near with . For the system above in the unknowns , the relevant Jacobian at is
with determinant . So and are functions of near .
Derivatives of local branches
Definition Under the hypotheses of the implicit function theorem, differentiating the identity with the chain rule gives . Since is invertible along the branch, for every in
with both matrices evaluated at the point . Here is the Jacobian of and is the matrix of partial derivatives of in .
For one equation solved for this reads
In plain words You get the derivatives of the hidden function without solving for it. Differentiate the equations, then solve a small linear system for the rates you want.
Example On near we have , and , so at that point
For the system, differentiate both equations with respect to , holding fixed. At this gives
Adding the two equations gives , so and then . The matrix formula gives the same values together with and .
The inverse function theorem
Definition Let be open, let be on , and let be a point of with
Then there are open sets and with such that maps one-to-one onto , the inverse is on , and
The same formula holds at every point of , with replaced by the point of that sends there.
In plain words If the derivative at a point is an invertible matrix, then near that point the map itself can be undone smoothly, and the derivative of the undoing map is the inverse matrix.
Example Let , which is on . Its Jacobian has determinant
which is nonzero away from the origin. At we get and
So if and , the local inverse near has and there.
Local versus global inverses
Definition A map has a global inverse on when it is one-to-one on all of . The inverse function theorem gives only local inverses. A map with at every point of an open set need not be one-to-one on that set. In the other direction, does not rule out an inverse, but if an inverse exists it cannot be differentiable at .
In plain words An invertible derivative guarantees that the map can be undone near each point separately. Gluing those local inverses into one inverse on the whole domain can fail, because the map may wrap around and hit the same point twice.
Example The polar map on the open set has everywhere, yet , so it has no global inverse. The squaring map above behaves the same way, since . In one variable, is one-to-one with , and its inverse is not differentiable at .
Tangent planes to level surfaces
Definition Let be on an open set of , let and suppose . Then some partial derivative of is nonzero at , so by the implicit function theorem the level set is, near , the graph of a function of two of the variables. Its tangent plane at is
and is a normal vector. If the theorem says nothing, and the level set may have no tangent plane there.
In plain words A nonzero gradient both proves that the level set is a smooth surface near the point and hands you its normal vector.
Example For at , the gradient is . The tangent plane is
which simplifies to . Solving for gives slopes and , matching the branch derivatives found earlier. By contrast the cone has zero gradient at the origin, and it has no tangent plane at its tip.
Check yourself
- Show that defines as a function of near , and find there.
Show the answer
The function is on and . Its partial equals at , so the theorem applies. Then
- For near , find and of the local inverse at . Why is there no local inverse near ?
Show the answer
The second column of the inverse matrix found above gives and . At the origin the Jacobian determinant is , so the theorem does not apply. In fact no local inverse exists, because every disk around contains a point together with , and these two different points have the same image.
- Find the tangent plane to at .
Show the answer
The gradient of is . The tangent plane is , which simplifies to .