The numbers , and are all less than , by one tenth, one hundredth and one thousandth. So it seems that , with nines forever, should also fall a tiny bit short of . Is there any real number between and ? This page explains what an infinite decimal means, shows that no such number exists, and concludes that and are two names for the same real number.
Key terms
0.999… equals 1
Definition The equality says that the repeating decimal with the digit in every place after the decimal point names exactly the real number . A decimal with infinitely many digits has no last digit. It is defined as the limit of its finite truncations, which here are
Every truncation is less than , and each added nine makes the gap ten times smaller. The limit is for two reasons. No truncation is above , so the limit is not above . And no number with can be the limit, because once , the truncation and all the later ones stay above by at least the fixed positive amount , so they never come close to . So exactly, in the real numbers. The surprise comes from treating as a very long finite decimal, from picturing a last nine, or from imagining an infinitely small positive gap. None of these exists among the real numbers, and the equality has nothing to do with rounding.
In plain words The decimal is not a list of nines that is still being written. It names the one number that its truncations close in on, and that number is .
Example Suppose someone proposes that is one millionth less than , so that it equals . The truncation with seven nines is , which is already above that number, and so is every later truncation. The same reasoning with more nines defeats any proposed positive gap, however small. An algebra check agrees. Let . Moving every digit one place to the left multiplies by , and the digits after the point are still all nines, so
and . This step uses the fact that is already a definite real number, the limit above. Subtracting from removes the whole infinite tail at once and never has to match up a last digit, since there is none.
Repeating decimal
Definition A decimal expansion , in which each digit is one of , names the real number
which is the limit of its finite truncations. A whole number part in front, as in , is added to this sum. A repeating decimal is one whose digits, from some place on, consist of one fixed block repeated forever. It is written with a bar over the block, as in or , or with dots. The repeating decimals, which include the terminating ones that end in repeating zeros, name exactly the rational numbers, the fractions of whole numbers with . A real number has two decimal expansions exactly when it has a terminating one with a last nonzero digit, and then the other one ends in repeating nines, as in and . Every other real number has only one decimal expansion.
In plain words A repeating decimal is a pattern of digits that goes on forever with no last digit, and it stands for one exact number, the one that its cut-off versions approach.
Example The fraction has the expansion , because its truncations , and fall short of by , and , gaps that shrink toward . Multiplying the exact value by gives . Multiplying every term of the convergent series by multiplies its sum by and gives , which is another view of the same equality. The decimal splits into and the tail , a geometric series whose sum is
so .
Limit of a sequence
Definition A sequence of real numbers has the limit , written , if for every positive number there is a whole number such that for every . A sequence has at most one limit. If every term is at most a number and the sequence has a limit, then the limit is also at most . If the sequence is increasing and has a limit, then the limit is at least as large as every term.
In plain words Pick any tolerance, as small as you like. From some point on, every term is within that tolerance of the limit and stays within it. The limit is a single number, and it need not be one of the terms.
Example For and , the distance is . For take , since for every , while fails, because is not less than itself. For any there is a power below it, and then every later term is within of . So
although none of the terms equals . The same kind of limit gives the meeting time in Zeno’s Achilles and the Tortoise.
Real number
Definition The real numbers are the numbers that measure positions on a number line. They include the whole numbers, the fractions and irrational numbers such as and , with the usual arithmetic and order. Two of their properties matter here. First, every increasing sequence of real numbers whose terms all stay below some fixed number has a limit, and that limit is a real number. This is the completeness of the real numbers, and it is why every infinite decimal names a real number. Second, there is no infinitely small positive real number. For every real there is a whole number with . It follows that a real number that is at most for every must be , and that two different real numbers always have other real numbers between them, such as . Some larger number systems, such as the hyperreal numbers, do contain infinitely small positive numbers, but they are not the real numbers, and an expression like would need its own definition there. On this page, as in school mathematics and calculus, decimals name real numbers.
In plain words On the real number line there is no positive gap smaller than every one of , , and so on. Two points with no room at all between them are the same point.
Example Let . The limit of an increasing sequence is at least as large as each term, so , and therefore for every . Since no truncation is above , also , so . The only real number with both properties is , so . This also answers the opening question. A real number is below the truncation as soon as , so it is below too, and no real number lies strictly between and .
Finite truncation
Definition The truncation after places of a decimal keeps its whole number part and its first digits after the decimal point and drops all the later digits. For a decimal it is the finite decimal
Each truncation is a rational number that can be written as a fraction with denominator . For a decimal without a minus sign that names the number , the truncations satisfy , because the dropped digits add at most
and the upper bound is reached only when every dropped digit is . For every there is a next truncation , so there is no last truncation, just as there is no last digit.
In plain words A truncation is what you get by stopping a decimal after some number of digits. It is never above the full value, and it falls short by at most one unit in its last kept place.
Example The truncations of are , , and so on, with gaps , and from . Every statement about a truncation, such as or , is true, and none of them contradicts , which is a statement about the limit. For , the truncations after two and four places are and , and the bound says that lies between and .
Check yourself
- Show that equals , once with a geometric series and once by finding the gaps between and the truncations.
Show the answer
The decimal is plus the tail , a geometric series with first term and ratio , so
The truncations , and fall short of by , and . After places the gap is , which becomes smaller than any positive number, and no truncation is above , so the limit is . In the same way every terminating decimal with a last nonzero digit has a second expansion, for example and .
- Someone says that the difference is , a decimal with infinitely many zeros followed by a . What is wrong with this?
Show the answer
Each digit of a decimal sits in a numbered place, the first, second, third and so on after the decimal point. A that comes after infinitely many zeros would need a place after every numbered place, and there is no such place, so is not a decimal at all. If every place holds a , the decimal is .
The difference can also be found directly. Since is at least each truncation , the difference is at most for every , and it is not negative. The only such real number is , so the difference is exactly .
- In base two, the digits after the point count halves, quarters, eighths and so on, so in base two means . Show that it equals , find the gap between and the truncation after digits, and find how many digits bring that gap below one thousandth.
Show the answer
The truncation after digits is
so its gap from is . These gaps become smaller than any positive number, and no truncation is above , so the limit is , by the same argument as for . The geometric series formula with gives the same sum, .
Since and , the gap after digits is , more than one thousandth, and after digits it is , less than one thousandth. So digits are needed. In base two the number has the two expansions and , just as it has and in base ten, and in each base the repeated digit is the largest digit available.