The integrand is positive on , because its numerator and denominator are both negative there, and its values stay below . So the integral is a number between and , yet none of the earlier techniques produces an antiderivative. This page places the integral in a family with a parameter , differentiates with respect to so that the logarithm cancels, justifies that step with an integrable bound and fixes the constant from a known value. The answer is .
Key terms
Parameter family of integrals
Definition A parameter family of integrals is a function of a parameter defined by an integral in another variable,
for the values of in a set where the integral converges. The limits may be infinite. The integration variable is used up by the integral, so depends on alone. To evaluate a hard integral this way, choose the family so that the target is for one value , the partial derivative is easier to integrate than , and is known at some .
In plain words Instead of one curve there is a whole collection of curves, one for each value of , and is the area under the curve with that value. The difficult integral is one member of the collection, and the hope is that the way the area changes with is simpler than the area itself.
Example For the target integral, replace in the numerator by and keep the ,
for . Then is the target integral, and because for every in . The power is the right choice because its derivative in is , which contains the logarithm of the denominator.
Removable endpoint limits
Definition Let be continuous on an open interval with finite endpoints. If the one-sided limits and exist as finite numbers, defining at and at by these limits gives a continuous function on . Its integral over is an ordinary definite integral, it equals the improper integral of over , and the values at the two endpoints do not affect it.
In plain words A formula that looks undefined at an endpoint, for example of the form , may still have a sensible value there. When both endpoint limits are finite numbers, the gaps can be filled, the graph becomes a continuous curve on a closed interval, and the integral needs no special treatment.
Example For the family integrand with , put , which tends to from below as . Then
the derivative of at . As with , the numerator tends to while , so the quotient tends to , and for the integrand is everywhere. For the target integrand extends to a continuous function on that increases from to , so its integral lies between and .
Differentiation under the integral sign
Definition Let be an interval of parameter values and an interval of values, bounded or not. Suppose that
- the functions and are continuous for and in ,
- the integral converges for every in ,
- some function with satisfies for all and all in .
Then is differentiable on , with a one-sided derivative at an endpoint of that belongs to , and
When and are closed bounded intervals and and are continuous on the whole rectangle , the bound is automatic, because a continuous function on a closed bounded rectangle is bounded and a constant is integrable over .
In plain words The rate at which an area changes with a parameter is the area under the rate at which the curve changes, provided one fixed function with finite area lies above all of those rates. The method is also known as Feynman’s trick.
Example For the family with in , write for . Then
and , so is an integrable bound on . The theorem gives, for every and with a right derivative at ,
where the lower limit contributes nothing because . The functions on with derivative are , and gives . So for , and the target integral is
Integrable bound
Definition For a family with in and in , an integrable bound for the parameter derivative is a function that does not depend on , with and
for all in and all in . Differentiability is a local property, so it is enough that each value in has such a bound for the in within some fixed distance of .
In plain words The bound is one ceiling that lies above the rate of change for every parameter value at once, and the area under the ceiling is finite. Without such a ceiling, the derivative of the integral and the integral of the derivative can differ, or the second one may not exist.
Example In the target family the bound is on , since for all . Without a bound the step can fail. For every the Dirichlet integral
does not depend on , so its derivative is . Differentiating inside the integral instead gives , which diverges. No integrable bound exists here, since a bound would have to lie above , whose integral over is infinite.
Leibniz integral rule
Definition Let and be continuous on a rectangle , and let and be differentiable on with values in . Then for in , with one-sided derivatives at and ,
With fixed limits and the two boundary terms are zero, which is differentiation under the integral sign on a closed bounded interval.
In plain words When the limits move with the parameter, the area changes for two reasons. The curve changes height, which the integral of measures, and the edges move, which adds or removes a thin strip at each end with area about the height there times the distance the edge moves. In the target family the limits and stay fixed, so no edge terms appear.
Example For let
Directly, , so . The rule applies on every rectangle with , where and its partial derivative are continuous, and it finds the same derivative as a balance of two terms,
The moving upper edge contributes , and the falling heights inside take away the same amount.
Constant from a known value
Definition Let be continuous on an interval with at every interior point, and let be continuous on with there as well. Then for a single constant , and one known value at a point of gives . The derivative alone determines only up to this constant, and the known value has to be found independently of the formula being derived.
In plain words Knowing how fast a quantity changes tells you its shape but not its starting height. One value where the integral is easy, often because the integrand vanishes there, pins down the height.
Example In the target family , and at the integrand is on , so . Since , the constant is . Dropping this step and keeping, say, would give , which is impossible because the integrand stays below .
Check yourself
- Evaluate with the family found on this page.
Show the answer
Write the integrand as the difference of two members of the family,
Both integrals converge, so the integral is .
- For let
Find by differentiating with respect to . Which integrable bound justifies the step, and which known value fixes the constant?
Show the answer
The integrand has the removable limit as and decays exponentially as , so converges. Its derivative with respect to is . One bound for all is impossible, because such a bound would be at least for every , which is not integrable over . Instead fix any . For ,
and is finite. Since was arbitrary, for every
and . The known value is , because the integrand is when . Hence and , for example .
- Let for real . Use differentiation under the integral sign, integration by parts and the value to find .
Show the answer
The derivative of the integrand with respect to is , and its absolute value is at most for every . That bound is integrable, since , so is the integral of from to . Integrate by parts with and , so that and . The boundary term is at and tends to as . What remains is , which is times the integral defining , so
By the product rule, the derivative of is , so is constant. Its value at is , the half-line Gaussian integral. Therefore
and for example .