Unit 6, lesson 32

Inverse Laplace Transforms and Partial Fractions

How to recover a signal from a rational Laplace transform with partial fractions, giving every power of a repeated pole its own term and each irreducible quadratic factor a linear numerator over a completed square.

  • Video 32
  • The Laplace Transform and Its Inverse

Solving an equation with the Laplace transform usually ends with a fraction in ss, and with the question of which signal has that Laplace transform. A table lists only simple shapes such as 1/(s−a)1/(s - a) and 1/(s−a)21/(s - a)^2, so a large fraction has to be split into pieces of those shapes first. This lesson explains why the signal is determined by its Laplace transform, how partial fractions handle repeated and quadratic factors, and how completing the square exposes a damped oscillation. Throughout, t≥0t \ge 0 is time and ss is a complex number.

Key terms

Inverse Laplace transform

Definition Let ff be piecewise continuous on [0,∞)[0, \infty) and of exponential order, with L{f}(s)=F(s)\mathcal{L}\{f\}(s) = F(s) on some half-plane Re⁡s>σ\operatorname{Re} s > \sigma. Then ff is an inverse Laplace transform of FF, written f=L−1{F}f = \mathcal{L}^{-1}\{F\}. By the uniqueness theorem, two such functions with the same Laplace transform on a half-plane agree at every t>0t > 0 where both are continuous. So the inverse is determined except at jumps, and a continuous inverse, when one exists, is unique on all of [0,∞)[0, \infty). The inverse is linear, and it describes the signal only for t≥0t \ge 0. Every such FF tends to 00 as Re⁡s→∞\operatorname{Re} s \to \infty, so a nonzero polynomial in ss is not the Laplace transform of any piecewise continuous function of exponential order.

In plain words The Laplace transform keeps everything about a signal except its values at isolated jumps, so a table of pairs can be read backward. In practice, split FF into entries of the table and invert each one.

Example Linearity and the pairs L{1}=1/s\mathcal{L}\{1\} = 1/s, L{t2}=2/s3\mathcal{L}\{t^2\} = 2/s^3 and L{e2t}=1/(s−2)\mathcal{L}\{e^{2t}\} = 1/(s - 2) give

L−1{3s+4s3−1s−2}=3+2t2−e2t,\begin{aligned} &\mathcal{L}^{-1}\left\{\frac{3}{s} + \frac{4}{s^3} - \frac{1}{s - 2}\right\} \\[0.4em] &\quad = 3 + 2t^2 - e^{2t}, \end{aligned}

where the Laplace transform converges for Re⁡s>2\operatorname{Re} s > 2. This signal is continuous, so it is the only continuous inverse. The function equal to 11 for t≠1t \ne 1 and to 77 at t=1t = 1 has the same Laplace transform 1/s1/s as the constant 11, which is why a value at a single point can never be recovered.

Partial fractions

Definition Let F=P/QF = P/Q be a ratio of polynomials with real coefficients, with all common factors of PP and QQ cancelled. The zeros of QQ are then the poles of FF. If FF is the Laplace transform of a piecewise continuous function of exponential order, it is strictly proper, deg⁡P<deg⁡Q\deg P < \deg Q, because it must tend to 00. When the degrees fail this, long division splits off a polynomial in ss, which belongs to impulses and their derivatives rather than to an ordinary function. For strictly proper FF, factor QQ over the reals into powers (s−a)m(s - a)^m of linear factors and powers (s2+ps+q)k(s^2 + ps + q)^k of quadratic factors with p2<4qp^2 < 4q. Then FF is the sum, over all the factors, of the terms

∑j=1mAj(s−a)jand∑j=1kBjs+Cj(s2+ps+q)j,\begin{gathered} \sum_{j = 1}^{m} \frac{A_j}{(s - a)^j} \quad \text{and} \\[0.4em] \sum_{j = 1}^{k} \frac{B_j s + C_j}{(s^2 + ps + q)^j}, \end{gathered}

and these real constants exist and are unique. At a simple pole aa, multiplying FF by s−as - a and setting s=as = a gives the coefficient A1A_1 directly. The Laplace integral of the inverse converges exactly on the half-plane Re⁡s>σ0\operatorname{Re} s > \sigma_0, where σ0\sigma_0 is the largest real part of a pole.

In plain words Split a complicated fraction into the simplest fractions its denominator allows. Each simple fraction is a table entry, so its inverse can be read off.

Example To write (5s+1)/((s−1)(s+2))(5s + 1)/((s - 1)(s + 2)) as A/(s−1)+B/(s+2)A/(s - 1) + B/(s + 2), multiply by s−1s - 1 and set s=1s = 1, which gives A=6/3=2A = 6/3 = 2. Multiplying by s+2s + 2 and setting s=−2s = -2 gives B=(−9)/(−3)=3B = (-9)/(-3) = 3. So

5s+1(s−1)(s+2)=2s−1+3s+2,\begin{aligned} &\frac{5s + 1}{(s - 1)(s + 2)} \\[0.4em] &\quad = \frac{2}{s - 1} + \frac{3}{s + 2}, \end{aligned}

and the inverse is 2et+3e−2t2e^{t} + 3e^{-2t}, with region of convergence Re⁡s>1\operatorname{Re} s > 1 set by the pole at 11.

Repeated poles

Definition A pole aa of F=P/QF = P/Q in lowest terms has multiplicity mm when aa is a root of QQ of multiplicity mm, and it is a repeated pole when m≥2m \ge 2. In the partial fraction form it needs all mm terms Aj/(s−a)jA_j/(s - a)^j for j=1,…,mj = 1, \ldots, m. Their inverses come from the pair

L{tneat}=n!(s−a)n+1,Re⁡s>a,n=0,1,2,…,\begin{gathered} \mathcal{L}\{t^n e^{at}\} = \frac{n!}{(s - a)^{n + 1}}, \\[0.4em] \operatorname{Re} s > a, \quad n = 0, 1, 2, \ldots, \end{gathered}

so a pole of multiplicity mm contributes eate^{at} times a polynomial in tt of degree m−1m - 1. With G(s)=(s−a)mF(s)G(s) = (s - a)^m F(s), the coefficients are

Am−j=1j! G(j)(a),j=0,…,m−1.\begin{gathered} A_{m - j} = \frac{1}{j!}\,G^{(j)}(a), \\[0.4em] j = 0, \ldots, m - 1. \end{gathered}

In plain words Each extra power of the same factor puts one more power of tt in front of the exponential. The highest power is read off by evaluating, and the lower ones by differentiating first.

Example Take the fraction FF with numerator 3s3+11s2+39s+613s^3 + 11s^2 + 39s + 61 and denominator (s+1)2(s2+4s+13)(s + 1)^2(s^2 + 4s + 13). The pole −1-1 is double, so the form is

F(s)=As+1+B(s+1)2+Cs+Ds2+4s+13.\begin{aligned} F(s) &= \frac{A}{s + 1} + \frac{B}{(s + 1)^2} \\[0.4em] &\quad + \frac{Cs + D}{s^2 + 4s + 13}. \end{aligned}

Here G(s)=(s+1)2F(s)=N(s)/Q(s)G(s) = (s + 1)^2F(s) = N(s)/Q(s) with N(s)=3s3+11s2+39s+61N(s) = 3s^3 + 11s^2 + 39s + 61 and Q(s)=s2+4s+13Q(s) = s^2 + 4s + 13. Since N(−1)=30N(-1) = 30 and Q(−1)=10Q(-1) = 10, the top coefficient is B=G(−1)=3B = G(-1) = 3. For AA, differentiate. The quadratic term of GG keeps a factor (s+1)2(s + 1)^2, so its derivative vanishes at −1-1, and A=G′(−1)A = G'(-1). With N′(−1)=26N'(-1) = 26 and Q′(−1)=2Q'(-1) = 2, the quotient rule gives

A=G′(−1)=26⋅10−30⋅2102=2.\begin{aligned} A &= G'(-1) \\[0.4em] &= \frac{26 \cdot 10 - 30 \cdot 2}{10^2} = 2. \end{aligned}

The two terms invert to 2e−t2e^{-t} and 3te−t3te^{-t}.

Irreducible quadratic factor

Definition A real quadratic s2+ps+qs^2 + ps + q is irreducible when p2−4q<0p^2 - 4q < 0. It has no real roots, and its roots are the complex conjugate pair α±iβ\alpha \pm i\beta with

α=−p2,β=q−p24>0.\begin{gathered} \alpha = -\frac{p}{2}, \\[0.4em] \beta = \sqrt{q - \frac{p^2}{4}} > 0. \end{gathered}

In partial fractions each power of such a factor gets a numerator of degree one, Bjs+CjB_j s + C_j. A constant numerator is not enough in general. The full form has exactly deg⁡Q\deg Q unknowns, one for each coefficient that a numerator of lower degree can have, and dropping one of them leaves some numerators out of reach. The pair of conjugate poles produces the oscillating signals eαtcos⁡βte^{\alpha t}\cos\beta t and eαtsin⁡βte^{\alpha t}\sin\beta t.

In plain words A quadratic that cannot be factored over the reals hides a pair of complex poles. Keep it whole, give it a numerator of the form Cs+DCs + D, and expect a damped or growing oscillation.

Example Continue with the fraction FF of the previous example. The factor s2+4s+13s^2 + 4s + 13 has p2−4q=16−52=−36<0p^2 - 4q = 16 - 52 = -36 < 0, so it is irreducible, with roots −2±3i-2 \pm 3i. Clearing denominators gives

N(s)=A(s+1)Q(s)+BQ(s)+(Cs+D)(s+1)2.\begin{aligned} N(s) &= A(s + 1)Q(s) \\[0.4em] &\quad + BQ(s) \\[0.4em] &\quad + (Cs + D)(s + 1)^2. \end{aligned}

The coefficient of s3s^3 gives A+C=3A + C = 3, so C=1C = 1. The constant term gives 13A+13B+D=6113A + 13B + D = 61, so D=61−26−39=−4D = 61 - 26 - 39 = -4. Hence

F(s)=2s+1+3(s+1)2+s−4s2+4s+13.\begin{aligned} F(s) &= \frac{2}{s + 1} + \frac{3}{(s + 1)^2} \\[0.4em] &\quad + \frac{s - 4}{s^2 + 4s + 13}. \end{aligned}

A constant numerator would fail here. With C=0C = 0 the s3s^3 coefficient would force A=3A = 3, while the derivative computation forces A=2A = 2.

Completing the square

Definition For an irreducible quadratic, completing the square gives

s2+ps+q=(s+p2)2+q−p24=(s−α)2+β2.\begin{aligned} &s^2 + ps + q \\[0.4em] &\quad = \Bigl(s + \frac{p}{2}\Bigr)^2 + q - \frac{p^2}{4} \\[0.4em] &\quad = (s - \alpha)^2 + \beta^2. \end{aligned}

Regroup the numerator around the same shift, Cs+D=C(s−α)+(D+Cα)Cs + D = C(s - \alpha) + (D + C\alpha), and use the pairs

L{eαtcos⁡βt}=s−α(s−α)2+β2,L{eαtsin⁡βt}=β(s−α)2+β2,\begin{aligned} &\mathcal{L}\{e^{\alpha t}\cos\beta t\} \\[0.4em] &\quad = \frac{s - \alpha}{(s - \alpha)^2 + \beta^2}, \\[0.4em] &\mathcal{L}\{e^{\alpha t}\sin\beta t\} \\[0.4em] &\quad = \frac{\beta}{(s - \alpha)^2 + \beta^2}, \end{aligned}

both valid for Re⁡s>α\operatorname{Re} s > \alpha. They follow from L{e(α±iβ)t}=1/(s−α∓iβ)\mathcal{L}\{e^{(\alpha \pm i\beta)t}\} = 1/(s - \alpha \mp i\beta), Euler’s formula and linearity. The constant part of the numerator must be written as a multiple of β\beta before the sine pair applies.

In plain words The square is centered at α\alpha, the real part of the complex poles, which becomes the exponential rate, and the number β2\beta^2 added to the square is the frequency squared. The numerator has to be rewritten around the same shift, so that one piece matches the cosine and the rest matches the sine.

Example For the quadratic piece of FF, s2+4s+13=(s+2)2+9s^2 + 4s + 13 = (s + 2)^2 + 9, so α=−2\alpha = -2 and β=3\beta = 3. The numerator becomes s−4=(s+2)−6=(s+2)−2⋅3s - 4 = (s + 2) - 6 = (s + 2) - 2 \cdot 3, which inverts to e−2t(cos⁡3t−2sin⁡3t)e^{-2t}(\cos 3t - 2\sin 3t). The full inverse is

f(t)=2e−t+3te−t+e−2t(cos⁡3t−2sin⁡3t).\begin{aligned} f(t) &= 2e^{-t} + 3te^{-t} \\[0.4em] &\quad + e^{-2t}(\cos 3t - 2\sin 3t). \end{aligned}

Two checks support it. The value f(0)=2+0+1=3f(0) = 2 + 0 + 1 = 3 matches the limit of sF(s)sF(s) as s→∞s \to \infty, which is 33, the ratio of the leading coefficients. The poles are −1-1 and −2±3i-2 \pm 3i, and the largest real part is −1-1, so FF is the Laplace transform of ff for Re⁡s>−1\operatorname{Re} s > -1.

Check yourself

  1. Find the inverse Laplace transform of F(s)=(s+3)/(s+1)2F(s) = (s + 3)/(s + 1)^2.
Show the answer

Write the numerator around the pole as s+3=(s+1)+2s + 3 = (s + 1) + 2. Then

F(s)=1s+1+2(s+1)2,F(s) = \frac{1}{s + 1} + \frac{2}{(s + 1)^2},

and the pairs for e−te^{-t} and te−tte^{-t} give f(t)=(1+2t)e−tf(t) = (1 + 2t)e^{-t} for t≥0t \ge 0, with region Re⁡s>−1\operatorname{Re} s > -1. As a check, f(0)=1f(0) = 1 and sF(s)→1sF(s) \to 1 as s→∞s \to \infty.

  1. A classmate tries to write 1/(s2(s+1))1/(s^2(s + 1)) as A/s2+B/(s+1)A/s^2 + B/(s + 1). Show that no constants work, then find the correct decomposition and the inverse.
Show the answer

Clearing denominators would require 1=A(s+1)+Bs21 = A(s + 1) + Bs^2 for all ss. The s2s^2 coefficient gives B=0B = 0, the ss coefficient gives A=0A = 0, and the constant term gives A=1A = 1, a contradiction. The double pole at 00 needs both 1/s1/s and 1/s21/s^2, so write A/s+B/s2+C/(s+1)A/s + B/s^2 + C/(s + 1). With G(s)=s2F(s)=1/(s+1)G(s) = s^2F(s) = 1/(s + 1), the coefficient B=G(0)=1B = G(0) = 1 and A=G′(0)=−1A = G'(0) = -1. Multiplying by s+1s + 1 and setting s=−1s = -1 gives C=1C = 1. So

1s2(s+1)=−1s+1s2+1s+1,\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{s^2(s + 1)} &= -\frac{1}{s} + \frac{1}{s^2} \\[0.4em] &\quad + \frac{1}{s + 1}, \end{aligned}

and the inverse is −1+t+e−t-1 + t + e^{-t} for t≥0t \ge 0, with region Re⁡s>0\operatorname{Re} s > 0.

  1. Find the inverse Laplace transform of F(s)=(2s+1)/(s2+2s+5)F(s) = (2s + 1)/(s^2 + 2s + 5) and state the region of convergence.
Show the answer

The quadratic has p2−4q=4−20=−16<0p^2 - 4q = 4 - 20 = -16 < 0, so it is irreducible. Completing the square gives s2+2s+5=(s+1)2+4s^2 + 2s + 5 = (s + 1)^2 + 4, so α=−1\alpha = -1 and β=2\beta = 2. Regroup the numerator as 2s+1=2(s+1)−12s + 1 = 2(s + 1) - 1 and write the constant as a multiple of β=2\beta = 2,

F(s)=2(s+1)(s+1)2+4−12⋅2(s+1)2+4.\begin{aligned} F(s) &= \frac{2(s + 1)}{(s + 1)^2 + 4} \\[0.4em] &\quad - \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{2}{(s + 1)^2 + 4}. \end{aligned}

So f(t)=e−t(2cos⁡2t−12sin⁡2t)f(t) = e^{-t}\bigl(2\cos 2t - \tfrac{1}{2}\sin 2t\bigr) for t≥0t \ge 0. The poles are −1±2i-1 \pm 2i, so the region of convergence is Re⁡s>−1\operatorname{Re} s > -1. As a check, f(0)=2f(0) = 2, which matches the limit of sF(s)sF(s), the ratio 2/12/1 of the leading coefficients.

How this lesson connects