How to recover a signal from a rational Laplace transform with partial fractions, giving every power of a repeated pole its own term and each irreducible quadratic factor a linear numerator over a completed square.
Solving an equation with the Laplace transform usually ends with a fraction in s, and with the question of which signal has that Laplace transform. A table lists only simple shapes such as 1/(s−a) and 1/(s−a)2, so a large fraction has to be split into pieces of those shapes first. This lesson explains why the signal is determined by its Laplace transform, how partial fractions handle repeated and quadratic factors, and how completing the square exposes a damped oscillation. Throughout, t≥0 is time and s is a complex number.
Key terms
Inverse Laplace transform
Definition Let f be piecewise continuous on [0,∞) and of exponential order, with L{f}(s)=F(s) on some half-plane Res>σ. Then f is an inverse Laplace transform of F, written f=L−1{F}. By the uniqueness theorem, two such functions with the same Laplace transform on a half-plane agree at every t>0 where both are continuous. So the inverse is determined except at jumps, and a continuous inverse, when one exists, is unique on all of [0,∞). The inverse is linear, and it describes the signal only for t≥0. Every such F tends to 0 as Res→∞, so a nonzero polynomial in s is not the Laplace transform of any piecewise continuous function of exponential order.
In plain words The Laplace transform keeps everything about a signal except its values at isolated jumps, so a table of pairs can be read backward. In practice, split F into entries of the table and invert each one.
Example Linearity and the pairs L{1}=1/s, L{t2}=2/s3 and L{e2t}=1/(s−2) give
L−1{s3+s34−s−21}=3+2t2−e2t,
where the Laplace transform converges for Res>2. This signal is continuous, so it is the only continuous inverse. The function equal to 1 for t=1 and to 7 at t=1 has the same Laplace transform 1/s as the constant 1, which is why a value at a single point can never be recovered.
Partial fractions
Definition Let F=P/Q be a ratio of polynomials with real coefficients, with all common factors of P and Q cancelled. The zeros of Q are then the poles of F. If F is the Laplace transform of a piecewise continuous function of exponential order, it is strictly proper, degP<degQ, because it must tend to 0. When the degrees fail this, long division splits off a polynomial in s, which belongs to impulses and their derivatives rather than to an ordinary function. For strictly proper F, factor Q over the reals into powers (s−a)m of linear factors and powers (s2+ps+q)k of quadratic factors with p2<4q. Then F is the sum, over all the factors, of the terms
j=1∑m(s−a)jAjandj=1∑k(s2+ps+q)jBjs+Cj,
and these real constants exist and are unique. At a simple pole a, multiplying F by s−a and setting s=a gives the coefficient A1 directly. The Laplace integral of the inverse converges exactly on the half-plane Res>σ0, where σ0 is the largest real part of a pole.
In plain words Split a complicated fraction into the simplest fractions its denominator allows. Each simple fraction is a table entry, so its inverse can be read off.
Example To write (5s+1)/((s−1)(s+2)) as A/(s−1)+B/(s+2), multiply by s−1 and set s=1, which gives A=6/3=2. Multiplying by s+2 and setting s=−2 gives B=(−9)/(−3)=3. So
(s−1)(s+2)5s+1=s−12+s+23,
and the inverse is 2et+3e−2t, with region of convergence Res>1 set by the pole at 1.
Repeated poles
Definition A pole a of F=P/Q in lowest terms has multiplicity m when a is a root of Q of multiplicity m, and it is a repeated pole when m≥2. In the partial fraction form it needs all m terms Aj/(s−a)j for j=1,…,m. Their inverses come from the pair
L{tneat}=(s−a)n+1n!,Res>a,n=0,1,2,…,
so a pole of multiplicity m contributes eat times a polynomial in t of degree m−1. With G(s)=(s−a)mF(s), the coefficients are
Am−j=j!1G(j)(a),j=0,…,m−1.
In plain words Each extra power of the same factor puts one more power of t in front of the exponential. The highest power is read off by evaluating, and the lower ones by differentiating first.
Example Take the fraction F with numerator 3s3+11s2+39s+61 and denominator (s+1)2(s2+4s+13). The pole −1 is double, so the form is
F(s)=s+1A+(s+1)2B+s2+4s+13Cs+D.
Here G(s)=(s+1)2F(s)=N(s)/Q(s) with N(s)=3s3+11s2+39s+61 and Q(s)=s2+4s+13. Since N(−1)=30 and Q(−1)=10, the top coefficient is B=G(−1)=3. For A, differentiate. The quadratic term of G keeps a factor (s+1)2, so its derivative vanishes at −1, and A=G′(−1). With N′(−1)=26 and Q′(−1)=2, the quotient rule gives
A=G′(−1)=10226⋅10−30⋅2=2.
The two terms invert to 2e−t and 3te−t.
Irreducible quadratic factor
Definition A real quadratic s2+ps+q is irreducible when p2−4q<0. It has no real roots, and its roots are the complex conjugate pair α±iβ with
α=−2p,β=q−4p2>0.
In partial fractions each power of such a factor gets a numerator of degree one, Bjs+Cj. A constant numerator is not enough in general. The full form has exactly degQ unknowns, one for each coefficient that a numerator of lower degree can have, and dropping one of them leaves some numerators out of reach. The pair of conjugate poles produces the oscillating signals eαtcosβt and eαtsinβt.
In plain words A quadratic that cannot be factored over the reals hides a pair of complex poles. Keep it whole, give it a numerator of the form Cs+D, and expect a damped or growing oscillation.
Example Continue with the fraction F of the previous example. The factor s2+4s+13 has p2−4q=16−52=−36<0, so it is irreducible, with roots −2±3i. Clearing denominators gives
N(s)=A(s+1)Q(s)+BQ(s)+(Cs+D)(s+1)2.
The coefficient of s3 gives A+C=3, so C=1. The constant term gives 13A+13B+D=61, so D=61−26−39=−4. Hence
F(s)=s+12+(s+1)23+s2+4s+13s−4.
A constant numerator would fail here. With C=0 the s3 coefficient would force A=3, while the derivative computation forces A=2.
Completing the square
Definition For an irreducible quadratic, completing the square gives
s2+ps+q=(s+2p)2+q−4p2=(s−α)2+β2.
Regroup the numerator around the same shift, Cs+D=C(s−α)+(D+Cα), and use the pairs
both valid for Res>α. They follow from L{e(α±iβ)t}=1/(s−α∓iβ), Euler’s formula and linearity. The constant part of the numerator must be written as a multiple of β before the sine pair applies.
In plain words The square is centered at α, the real part of the complex poles, which becomes the exponential rate, and the number β2 added to the square is the frequency squared. The numerator has to be rewritten around the same shift, so that one piece matches the cosine and the rest matches the sine.
Example For the quadratic piece of F, s2+4s+13=(s+2)2+9, so α=−2 and β=3. The numerator becomes s−4=(s+2)−6=(s+2)−2⋅3, which inverts to e−2t(cos3t−2sin3t). The full inverse is
f(t)=2e−t+3te−t+e−2t(cos3t−2sin3t).
Two checks support it. The value f(0)=2+0+1=3 matches the limit of sF(s) as s→∞, which is 3, the ratio of the leading coefficients. The poles are −1 and −2±3i, and the largest real part is −1, so F is the Laplace transform of f for Res>−1.
Check yourself
Find the inverse Laplace transform of F(s)=(s+3)/(s+1)2.
Show the answer
Write the numerator around the pole as s+3=(s+1)+2. Then
F(s)=s+11+(s+1)22,
and the pairs for e−t and te−t give f(t)=(1+2t)e−t for t≥0, with region Res>−1. As a check, f(0)=1 and sF(s)→1 as s→∞.
A classmate tries to write 1/(s2(s+1)) as A/s2+B/(s+1). Show that no constants work, then find the correct decomposition and the inverse.
Show the answer
Clearing denominators would require 1=A(s+1)+Bs2 for all s. The s2 coefficient gives B=0, the s coefficient gives A=0, and the constant term gives A=1, a contradiction. The double pole at 0 needs both 1/s and 1/s2, so write A/s+B/s2+C/(s+1). With G(s)=s2F(s)=1/(s+1), the coefficient B=G(0)=1 and A=G′(0)=−1. Multiplying by s+1 and setting s=−1 gives C=1. So
s2(s+1)1=−s1+s21+s+11,
and the inverse is −1+t+e−t for t≥0, with region Res>0.
Find the inverse Laplace transform of F(s)=(2s+1)/(s2+2s+5) and state the region of convergence.
Show the answer
The quadratic has p2−4q=4−20=−16<0, so it is irreducible. Completing the square gives s2+2s+5=(s+1)2+4, so α=−1 and β=2. Regroup the numerator as 2s+1=2(s+1)−1 and write the constant as a multiple of β=2,
F(s)=(s+1)2+42(s+1)−21⋅(s+1)2+42.
So f(t)=e−t(2cos2t−21sin2t) for t≥0. The poles are −1±2i, so the region of convergence is Res>−1. As a check, f(0)=2, which matches the limit of sF(s), the ratio 2/1 of the leading coefficients.
May we count page visits to understand which courses and learning features are useful? Cloudflare collects visit and performance statistics, without your account details or answers. Your choice does not affect access. Details