How many events will a sensor record in the next fifteen minutes? The answer is a count that can be , , or more, and there is no fixed number of trials to list. The Poisson distribution is one model for such a count, with a single parameter equal to the expected count over the stated window. This lesson gives its probability formula, shows why the probabilities add to , derives its mean and variance, turns a rate and an exposure into the parameter, and checks how well it approximates a binomial count.
Key terms
Poisson distribution
Definition Let . A random variable has the Poisson distribution with parameter , written , if its PMF is
for , and for every other . The support is the set of all nonnegative integers, and each of them has positive probability. The mass at uses and , so . For the distribution is defined as the point mass at , with .
In plain words A Poisson variable counts events in a fixed window of time, length, area or some other exposure, and for the model puts no upper limit on the count. Being a count does not make a variable Poisson. A count with a hard cap, such as the number of occupied seats in a room with seats, has probability above the cap, while every Poisson law with gives positive probability to every nonnegative integer.
Example A constructed sensor model says that the number of recorded events in fifteen minutes is . Then
The count is zero with probability , so . For at most two events, add the first three masses,
The probability of at least three events is the complement , not the single mass .
Poisson parameter
Definition The parameter of is a nonnegative real number, and it equals the expected count, , as the card on the mean and variance shows. This one number determines the whole distribution. It need not be an integer, although the count always is. Negative values are not allowed, since then would be negative. For and , consecutive masses satisfy
so the mass goes up from to when and goes down when . Hence the most likely count is , the greatest integer at most , when is not an integer, and when is a positive integer the counts and tie for the largest mass.
In plain words The parameter is the expected count over the stated window. The actual count need not equal the parameter, and the parameter need not be the single most likely count. A mean of events is a sensible parameter even though a window never holds events.
Example For the sensor model with , the masses at and are equal, since and . Both are , and the mean is one of the two most likely counts. For the masses at , , and are about , , and , so the most likely count is , and the mean is not a possible value at all. The degenerate law puts probability on the count .
Rate times exposure
Definition Exposure is the amount of time, length, area or other measure over which events are counted. Suppose a model states that events occur at a constant average rate per unit of exposure, so that the expected count over an exposure of size is , and that this count is Poisson. Then the count over exposure is with
where and use the same unit, for example events per minute and minutes, so that is a number of events. Using this formula for windows of different sizes is part of the assumed model. It does not follow from the distribution of the count in a single window.
In plain words The rate describes the model per unit of exposure, and the parameter describes one particular window. Convert the units first, then multiply. Real mechanisms can break the constant-rate Poisson model, for example when the rate changes during the day, when events arrive in bursts, or when capacity limits the count. A measured average rate times the exposure estimates when the model holds, but it does not show that the model holds.
Example The sensor model with mean events per fifteen minutes has rate events per minute. Under the same constant-rate model, a thirty-minute window has and a one-hour window has . The probability of no events in thirty minutes is . Using for the thirty-minute window would confuse the rate with the parameter.
Exponential series
Definition For every real number , the exponential series converges, and its sum is
The Poisson masses are the terms of this series multiplied by the constant , so
Since every mass is nonnegative, this shows that the Poisson PMF is a valid distribution for every .
In plain words Before normalizing, the count gets the weight . These weights are exactly the terms of the series for , so they add to , and multiplying every weight by the single constant makes the total . That constant is the normalizing factor, and it also equals the probability of no events. The argument is about an infinite sum and assumes nothing about the counts being equally likely.
Example For the weights of the counts to are , , , , and , and the whole series adds to . The first three weights total , so is the share of the total weight that sits on the counts , and .
Poisson mean and variance
Definition If with , then , and . In the mean series the term is zero, and for the factor cancels against . With ,
In the same way, for the factor cancels against , the terms and are zero, and with ,
Since , the second moment is , and . All of these series converge, so both moments exist.
In plain words The mean and the variance are the same number, although the mean is measured in counts and the variance in squared counts. Equal mean and variance is a property of this family, not of counts in general, and it does not prove that a count is Poisson. A binomial count has variance , which is smaller than its mean whenever and .
Example For the sensor model with , the mean is events, the variance is and the standard deviation is events. A variable that equals or with probability each has mean and , so its variance is . Its mean and variance agree, yet it is not Poisson, since it never takes the value .
Poisson approximation to the binomial
Definition Let , and for each let , where as . Then for every fixed ,
In practice, a count with many trials and a small success probability is approximated by , which has the same mean. This is an approximation, not an equality. Le Cam’s inequality bounds its error. If and , then for every set of counts.
In plain words Many independent chances, each with a small probability, give a count that is nearly Poisson with the same mean. Under the binomial model the binomial probability is the exact answer, and the Poisson number stands in for it with an error that should be checked or bounded. The two laws are never identical when , because a binomial count never exceeds , while a Poisson count with a positive parameter exceeds with positive probability. Their variances also differ, against .
Example For independent trials with success probability , the exact probability of no successes is . The approximation with gives , which is off by about , or percentage points. Le Cam’s inequality guarantees an error of at most for every event, so the actual error here is far below the guarantee. The binomial variance is and the Poisson variance is .
Check yourself
- A constructed model for calls to a help desk assumes a constant rate of calls per hour and a Poisson count in every window. For a thirty-minute window, find the parameter, the probability of no calls, the probability of at least two calls, and the mean and variance of the count.
Show the answer
Thirty minutes is half an hour, so the parameter is call. The probability of no calls is . Exactly one call has probability as well, so
The mean and the variance both equal .
- Each of items in a batch is defective with probability , independently of the others. Find the exact probability of no defects, its Poisson approximation and the difference between them. Which of the two numbers is the answer under this model?
Show the answer
The number of defects is , so the exact probability of none is . The Poisson approximation uses and gives . The difference is about , roughly half the difference found for trials with probability , a binomial count with the same mean . The binomial value is the answer under the model. The Poisson value is an approximation, and its error is within the Le Cam bound .
- A sensor records every true event twice. The number of true events in an hour is modeled as , so the recorded count has mean . Is a variable?
Show the answer
No. The recorded count takes only even values, so , while a count equals with probability . The variances disagree too, since , while a Poisson count with mean has variance . Matching the mean is not enough. The recorded events arrive in pairs, and clustered events like these need not follow a Poisson law.