Put 100 dollars in a jar and add 20 more every week. Nobody describes that jar with a formula in the week number. You say what it holds now and how next week’s amount comes from this week’s. Many sequences arise exactly like this, one step at a time from the terms before.
Key terms
Recursive rule
Definition A recursive rule, or recurrence relation, expresses each term of a sequence after the first few through earlier terms. A rule of order gives from the index and the terms just before it,
where is the first index. At every step the rule has to produce a real number, so for instance it may never call for a division by .
In plain words A recursive rule tells you how to get the next term from the ones you already have. It says nothing about where to start.
Example If the jar holds dollars after weeks, its rule is for , a rule of order . Many books, and the calculus lessons, write the same rule one index higher, as for . A rule can also break down. Take and
Then , and the next step asks for , so there is no .
Initial value
Definition The initial values of a recursively defined sequence are the terms given directly, before the rule takes over. A rule of order needs initial values . When these are given and the rule produces a real number at every step, exactly one sequence has these initial values and satisfies the rule.
In plain words The rule says how to take a step. The initial values say where you stand before the first step, and a different start gives a different sequence.
Example The jar starts with , so its amounts are dollars. The table runs one rule, for , from three different initial values.
| Initial value | First five terms |
|---|---|
Generating terms
Definition To generate the terms of a recursively defined sequence of order , start from the initial values and apply the rule for , then , and so on in order. Each new term needs only the most recent terms, but reaching this way requires every term before it.
In plain words Work forward one term at a time and keep the last few terms in view, as many as the rule looks back. There is no skipping ahead.
Example Take , and for . Each step uses the two latest terms and then forgets the older one.
| Terms used | ||
|---|---|---|
| and | ||
| and | ||
| and | ||
| and |
Fibonacci recurrence
Definition The Fibonacci sequence is the sequence of order two given by
Many texts also use , which fits the same rule since .
In plain words Start with two ones. From then on each number is the sum of the two before it.
Example The first twelve Fibonacci numbers are
The ratios of neighboring terms swing above and below one value and close in on it.
It can be shown that these ratios approach the golden ratio
Explicit versus recursive description
Definition An explicit description gives as a formula in alone. A recursive description gives initial values and a rule in terms of earlier terms. Two descriptions define the same sequence when they agree at every index. An explicit formula fits a recursive description when it produces the initial values and turns the rule into an identity that holds for every the rule covers. These two checks prove that the formula gives every term, by mathematical induction.
In plain words An explicit formula lets you jump to any term. A recursive rule is often how the sequence actually arises, but you must walk to each term. When you have both, use whichever suits the question.
Example The rule , for gives , which suggests . The formula gives at the start, and putting it into the right side of the rule gives
so it fits. Going the other way, the explicit formula for has the recursive description and for . The Fibonacci numbers have an explicit formula too, Binet’s formula
It gives exactly, although nothing in the simple rule hints at square roots.
Recursion alone does not guarantee convergence
Definition A sequence converges to a number when its terms get and stay as close to as you like once is large enough. The exact definition comes in the lesson on sequence behavior and limiting values. A recursive rule defines a sequence as long as every step is defined, but that sequence need not converge. It may grow without bound, swing back and forth, or repeat a cycle, and under one rule the outcome can depend on the initial value. For a rule where is a polynomial, or more generally a function continuous at , a sequence that converges to must have . The converse is false, so a solution of does not show that the sequence converges.
In plain words Being able to compute terms forever does not mean they are heading anywhere. Solving only tells you where the sequence could settle, if it settles at all.
Example For the rule with the equation has the single solution .
| Initial value | First five terms | Behavior |
|---|---|---|
| constant, converges to | ||
| grows without bound | ||
| decreases without bound |
Only the start converges. Compare the rule
with , which gives and does settle on . The convergence of sequences lesson in calculus makes this precise.
Check yourself
- Generate the first five terms of , for . Then check that fits this description.
Show the answer
The terms are . The formula gives at the start, and
so it satisfies the rule as well.
- Find , then add the first ten Fibonacci numbers. How does the sum compare with ?
Show the answer
From the list above . The sum is
which is one less than .
- Use the rule for with and then with . Which start gives a convergent sequence?
Show the answer
Starting at gives , which keeps jumping and does not converge. Starting at gives , which converges to . The equation gives whatever the start, yet only one of the two starts settles there.