Raise the parameter of the logistic map a little at a time and record where its orbits end up. A single settled value splits into two at , the two split into four near , and then come eight, sixteen and more, ever faster, until beyond about the orbits for many values of never settle into a cycle at all. Why do stable rhythms keep splitting in two, and does disorder then take over for good? This page builds the bifurcation diagram that shows the cascade, explains each split with the slope test for cycles, and shows that the chaotic range is interrupted by periodic windows such as a stable three-cycle near .
Key terms
Period-doubling bifurcation
Definition A bifurcation is a parameter value at which the long-term behavior of a family of rules changes its kind. Take a family of rules on an interval whose slopes change continuously. A cycle of length is a list of different states that the rule visits in turn, sending each one to the next and back to . Its multiplier is the product of the slopes along the cycle. The cycle is stable if the multiplier lies strictly between and , and unstable if it is larger than in size. A period-doubling bifurcation happens at when, as increases through , the multiplier of a stable cycle of length decreases through , so that the cycle becomes unstable, while a new cycle of length branches off from it. In the logistic map the new cycle is stable just after , and its points lie in pairs on either side of the points of the old cycle. The logistic map goes through a whole cascade of these bifurcations, called the period-doubling route to chaos. At the fixed point , whose multiplier is , gives way to a two-cycle. At the two-cycle, whose multiplier is , gives way to a four-cycle. Doublings to , and follow at about , and , and the doubling points accumulate at . The ratios of successive gaps between doubling points tend to Feigenbaum’s constant . Mitchell Feigenbaum found in the 1970s that the same limit appears for a broad class of smooth one-hump maps whose top is shaped like a parabola, such as , whenever they go through such a cascade, which is why the constant is called universal.
In plain words Each time passes a doubling point, the current rhythm stops attracting nearby orbits, and a rhythm twice as long, which alternates around the old one, takes over. The doubling points crowd closer and closer together, so infinitely many of them fit below about .
Example At the two-cycle still exists. Its formula with gives exactly and . Its multiplier is , so it is unstable. The orbit of , after its transient, runs through a stable four-cycle, with multiplier about , in the order
rounded to four decimal places. The values and lie on either side of , and and lie on either side of . The orbit still alternates between a high value and a low value, as on the old two-cycle, but it now takes four steps to return to the same value. Every value still determines the next one through the same formula, so the four values come in a fixed order and no random choice is made between them.
Bifurcation diagram
Definition A bifurcation diagram of a family of rules plots long-term behavior against the parameter. For each value of on a fine grid, start an orbit at a chosen , discard a fixed number of early steps as the transient, and plot the next values of the orbit as dots above , with on the horizontal axis and the state on the vertical axis. Each vertical slice is a separate experiment with its own fixed , so the diagram is not the path of one orbit moving from left to right. A slice with one sharp dot suggests a stable fixed point, a slice with sharp dots suggests a cycle of length , and a slice with a cloud shows an orbit that did not settle during the plotted steps. The picture depends on the start, on the numbers of discarded and plotted steps and on the precision of the arithmetic, so it is evidence about long-term behavior and not a proof. For the logistic map the choice of start rarely matters, because it is known that whenever the map has a stable cycle, almost every start approaches it, meaning all starts except a set of total length zero.
In plain words Each column of dots answers one question. For this value of , which values does the orbit keep visiting once its transient is over?
Example Start every orbit at , discard the first steps and plot the next . Some slices of the logistic map then look like this, with values rounded to four decimal places.
| Values in the slice | What it suggests | |
|---|---|---|
| stable fixed point | ||
| stable fixed point | ||
| and | two-cycle | |
| , , , | four-cycle | |
| eight values from to | eight-cycle | |
| , , | three-cycle | |
| a cloud spread over all of | no cycle |
Between and the slices join into the familiar picture. One branch splits at , each branch splits again near , and further splits come faster and faster until a cloud appears. Magnifying a small piece of the diagram shows more splitting, and the branches look roughly like smaller copies of the whole, although they are not exact scaled copies of each other. Each cycle in the table can be confirmed by computing it with significant digits and checking that its multiplier is smaller than in size.
Deterministic chaos
Definition A system is deterministic when its current state fixes every later state exactly, with no random step. Deterministic chaos is behavior of such a system that never settles into a regular pattern and depends extremely sensitively on the starting state. Several precise definitions are in use. A widely used one, due to Robert Devaney, calls a rule that sends an interval into itself chaotic on when three conditions hold. The first is sensitive dependence on initial conditions. There is a distance such that, as close as we like to every starting value in , there is another starting value in whose orbit is more than away from the first orbit at some later step. The second is transitivity. For any two intervals inside , however short, some orbit that starts in the first later visits the second. The third is that cycles are dense, meaning that every interval inside , however short, contains a start whose orbit is a cycle. The logistic map with is chaotic on in this sense. A plotted cloud, or two computed orbits that drift apart, illustrates chaos but does not prove it, because a computer uses finitely many digits and finitely many steps.
In plain words The rule is exact, so nothing is random. Yet a tiny difference in the start can grow until two orbits have nothing in common, and some orbits wander through every part of the interval without ever repeating.
Example Take and the starts and , which differ by . Both orbits were computed with significant digits, so the table shows the true values, rounded.
| Step | Orbit of | Orbit of | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
After about thirty steps the two orbits have nothing in common. The reason is a trigonometric identity. Every value in can be written as for an angle , and
so each step of the rule doubles the angle. A small error in the angle therefore doubles at every step, and thirty doublings multiply it by . Ordinary computer arithmetic, with about significant digits, runs into the same growth. Evaluating the formula as written in that arithmetic gives an orbit of that is off by about at step and by more than at step .
Periodic window
Definition A periodic window of the logistic map is an interval of parameter values beyond in which a stable cycle appears and attracts the orbits, so that the bifurcation diagram shows a few sharp branches in place of the cloud. A window begins where a stable cycle is born, together with an unstable cycle of the same length, and the stable cycle then goes through its own period-doubling cascade before chaos returns. The most visible one is the period-three window, which begins at . Its three-cycle doubles to a six-cycle near , then to twelve and so on, with the doublings accumulating near . After that the orbits are chaotic again, first within three separate bands, which merge into a single cloud near . Windows are found throughout the chaotic range. It has been proved that every interval of parameters between and , however short, contains parameters with a stable cycle, and yet the parameters at which typical orbits never settle into a cycle take up a positive total length. Increasing beyond therefore does not mean steadily increasing disorder.
In plain words Even deep in the chaotic range there are stretches of where order comes back and orbits settle into a short repeating cycle. Most of these stretches are far too narrow to see in a plot.
Example At the orbit of , after its transient, runs through the three-cycle
rounded to four decimal places, with multiplier about , so the cycle is stable. A theorem of Sharkovskii from 1964 says that a continuous rule on an interval with a cycle of length three also has cycles of every other length. They exist at too, but all of them except the stable three-cycle are unstable, so the diagram shows only three dots.
Check yourself
- Take and follow the orbits of , and for a few steps. Do these orbits contradict the claim that the logistic map with is chaotic on ?
Show the answer
The start goes to , then to , and stays at . The start is a fixed point, since , and the start reaches it in one step, since . None of these orbits wanders, but there is no contradiction. Sensitive dependence does not say that every orbit looks irregular. It says that next to every start there are other starts whose orbits eventually separate from it. The fixed point has slope , so the start has gaps of about , , and from , doubling in size and switching sides at each step until the orbit is far away. Starts on cycles are even required by the definition, since dense cycles are one of its three conditions, and is a cycle of length one.
- Use the rounded doubling points , , and . Compute the gaps between them and the ratios of successive gaps. Then use to predict the next doubling point and the accumulation point .
Show the answer
The gaps are , and . The ratios are and , already close to . The next gap should be about , which predicts the next doubling point near . The computed value is . If every later gap is the one before divided by , the remaining gaps form a geometric series with sum
so , in agreement with the computed to four decimal places. The prediction works because the ratios settle down quickly, although the first ratios are not yet equal to .
- The two-cycle of the logistic map has multiplier . At which does it lose its stability, and what does the multiplier say at ?
Show the answer
At , where the two-cycle is born, the multiplier is , and it decreases as grows. The cycle stays stable until the multiplier reaches , so solve
The roots are , and the positive one is , the second doubling point. At the multiplier is , which is larger than in size, so the two-cycle is unstable there. That matches the stable four-cycle found at .