The equation , where , is nonlinear, so the theory of linear equations from the previous lessons does not apply to it. Still, the unknown never appears by itself, only through its derivatives, so the equation is really a first-order equation for the velocity . This lesson shows how to lower the order when either or is missing from the equation, how to rebuild with both initial values, and where the new coordinate stops being valid.
Key terms
Nonlinear order reduction
Definition Consider a second-order equation for an unknown function of , with . Nonlinear order reduction replaces it by first-order equations when one variable is absent from .
- If is absent, so the equation reads , the velocity is treated as a function of .
- If is absent, so the equation reads , the velocity is treated as a function of on an interval where .
In both cases one solves a first-order equation for and then the first-order equation for . The two steps supply two constants, fixed by and . The method works whether or not the equation is linear, and the integrals it leads to need not have closed forms.
In plain words Before trying anything else, look at which letters appear. A missing letter means the equation is really first order in the velocity, and one more integration recovers the position.
Example In neither nor appears, so either version applies. With as a function of the equation reads , and since is never zero, separation gives , so . One more integration gives
on the interval , of length . Differentiating confirms and . By contrast, contains both and , so neither substitution lowers its order.
Velocity substitution
Definition The velocity substitution sets and writes in terms of . If is regarded as a function of , then . If on an interval , then is strictly monotone on and has a differentiable inverse , so can be regarded as a function of , and the chain rule gives
The first form keeps as the independent variable. The second makes the independent variable and is valid only where .
In plain words The velocity can be recorded against or against the position . Against the acceleration is simply the derivative of . Against the chain rule brings in the factor , and the record makes sense only while moves in one direction, so that each position is passed once.
Example For the velocity is , so as a function of it is with . Then , which is indeed . For the second form breaks down near . The velocity equals for and for , so no single function of describes it on an interval around the turning point , where .
Missing dependent variable
Definition An equation in which does not appear is reduced by to the first-order problem
If solves this problem on an interval containing , then
solves the original problem on , so lives on the same interval as . The velocity datum belongs to the first-order problem and the height datum to the final integration. If for all , then is a solution of the reduced equation, and it gives the constant solutions , which a division by can lose.
In plain words With missing, the equation is a first-order equation for the slope. Solve for the slope with the slope datum, then integrate the slope starting from the height datum.
Example Solve with and . The velocity satisfies with . The constant also solves , and since solutions of this equation are unique, the solution with never reaches , so dividing by is safe. Separation gives , and gives , so
on . Integrating from the height datum gives
on . Its derivatives are and , with and . The maximal interval is , and both and tend to as . The constant solutions from the branch solve the equation too, but their slope does not match the data.
Missing independent variable
Definition An equation in which does not appear is called autonomous. On an interval where , the velocity substitution with as a function of reduces it to the first-order problem
where and . After solving for , the position follows from the separable equation with . A constant solution has and is not described by any function . The constant solutions are exactly the constants with , and they should be found from the original equation before dividing by .
In plain words With missing, the acceleration depends only on where you are and how fast you move, so the velocity can be recorded as a function of position. That record satisfies a first-order equation, and one more integration says where you are at each .
Example Solve with and . The only constant solution is , since forces , and it does not match the data. The reduced equation is , and integrating in gives
The data , give , so , and the positive initial slope selects . Then with separates into , so
This function has and , with and . It is positive and increasing on all of , so along the whole solution and the coordinate stays valid. As the solution blows up.
First integral
Definition A first integral of an autonomous equation is a continuously differentiable function , not constant on any open set, such that is constant on the interval of every solution. For with continuous and an antiderivative of , the function
is a first integral, because along every solution
Each solution therefore lies on a level set , with fixed by the initial data, even across points where . Solving the level set for the velocity gives . The sign is part of the data, and one level set can carry several different solutions as well as equilibria.
In plain words A first integral is a conserved quantity, like the energy of a frictionless particle. It replaces the second-order equation by a first-order relation between position and velocity, and only the sign of the velocity is left to choose.
Example For take . Doubling gives the conserved quantity . The data , give the value , and so do the data , . Both solutions lie on the level set , which in the plane consists of the curves and , meeting at the equilibrium . The first data follow and give on . The second data follow , so and
which has and , with the right initial values. One level set holds two different solutions, defined on two different intervals.
Local coordinate restriction
Definition Using as the independent coordinate is valid only on an interval of where . Since is continuous, such an interval exists around every point with , and is strictly monotone on it. At a turning point, where and , the velocity changes sign and the description switches from one branch to the other. There the reduced equation can have several solutions, including constant ones that do not solve the original equation, so the motion is continued with the original second-order equation. That equation has unique solutions when is continuously differentiable.
In plain words The position can label the points of a solution only while it keeps moving in one direction. When the motion stops and turns back, start a new chart, and let the original equation say which way the motion goes.
Example Take with and , which starts at a turning point. Here , the doubled first integral equals for these data, and so . The original equation gives , so is a local maximum of . The velocity is negative just to the right of and positive just to the left, which selects the branches
Separating either branch leads to the even function
which satisfies the equation and the data and is therefore the solution on all of . It decreases for and increases for , so each branch describes one half of the motion.
The reduced equation with is also solved by the constant , because its right side vanishes at . That constant is not a solution of the original equation, which demands wherever . Only the second-order equation decides what happens at the turning point.
Check yourself
- Solve with and , and give the interval on which the solution exists.
Show the answer
The variable is missing, so set . Then with . The constant does not match the data, and by uniqueness the solution never reaches it, so separation is safe and gives . The datum gives , so , which is defined for every . Integrating from gives
Indeed and . The solution exists on all of .
- A classmate solves with and by separating into , and then cannot find . What went wrong, and what is the solution?
Show the answer
Separation divides by and so assumes . The data give , and the constant solves . Since is continuously differentiable, it is the only solution with . So and for all . This constant solves the original equation, since , and it is one of the constant solutions that the division lost.
- Reduce to a first-order equation for as a function of , solve it, and find the first integral for the data , . Explain why can serve as a coordinate along the whole solution.
Show the answer
The variable is missing. With as a function of , the identity turns the equation into , a linear equation,
The integrating factor gives and then , so . At we need , so and
Multiplying by shows that the first integral is , with the value for these data. Its derivative along any solution is , so the relation holds on the whole interval of the solution, not only where . The right side of the relation has , which vanishes only at , where takes its minimum value . So is never zero, and since the solution satisfies throughout. It is strictly increasing, so is a valid coordinate along all of it. The last step can be left as an integral or evaluated numerically.