Unit 1, lesson 7

Limit Laws

The rules that compute limits of sums, differences, products, quotients, powers and roots from simpler limits, the conditions each rule needs, and how one of them is proved.

  • Theory part 13
  • Practice part 14
  • Limits of Functions

Theory, part 13

Nothing loads from YouTube until you press play.

Practice, part 14

Nothing loads from YouTube until you press play.

Proving every limit straight from the epsilon-delta definition would be slow. The limit laws let you split a complicated expression into pieces whose limits you already know and put the answers back together. Each law comes with conditions, and most mistakes with limits come from ignoring them.

Key terms

Sum law

Definition Let aa be a real number and suppose

lim⁡x→af(x)=Landlim⁡x→ag(x)=M\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = L \quad \text{and} \quad \lim_{x \to a} g(x) = M

both exist as real numbers. Then

lim⁡x→a(f(x)+g(x))=L+M.\lim_{x \to a} \bigl(f(x) + g(x)\bigr) = L + M.

These assumptions stay in force for every law on this page, and every law also holds for one-sided limits.

In plain words The limit of a sum is the sum of the limits, as long as both limits exist.

Example Since lim⁡x→2x2=4\lim_{x \to 2} x^2 = 4 and lim⁡x→23x=6\lim_{x \to 2} 3x = 6, the sum law gives

lim⁡x→2(x2+3x)=4+6=10.\lim_{x \to 2} (x^2 + 3x) = 4 + 6 = 10.

Difference law

Definition Under the same assumptions,

lim⁡x→a(f(x)−g(x))=L−M.\lim_{x \to a} \bigl(f(x) - g(x)\bigr) = L - M.

In plain words The limit of a difference is the difference of the limits.

Example Near x=1x = 1 the pieces tend to x3→1x^3 \to 1 and 4x→44x \to 4, so

lim⁡x→1(x3−4x)=1−4=−3.\lim_{x \to 1} (x^3 - 4x) = 1 - 4 = -3.

Constant multiple law

Definition For any constant cc,

lim⁡x→acf(x)=cL.\lim_{x \to a} c f(x) = cL.

In plain words Constant factors can be pulled out in front of the limit.

Example Pulling out the factor 5 gives

lim⁡x→−15x2=5lim⁡x→−1x2=5⋅1=5.\lim_{x \to -1} 5x^2 = 5 \lim_{x \to -1} x^2 = 5 \cdot 1 = 5.

Product law

Definition Under the assumptions above,

lim⁡x→af(x)g(x)=LM.\lim_{x \to a} f(x) g(x) = LM.

In plain words The limit of a product is the product of the limits, provided both limits exist. If one factor has no limit, this law tells you nothing, and the product may or may not have a limit.

Example The factors tend to 33 and 11 as x→2x \to 2, so

lim⁡x→2(x+1)(x2−3)=3⋅1=3.\lim_{x \to 2} (x + 1)(x^2 - 3) = 3 \cdot 1 = 3.

On the other hand xsin⁡(1/x)x \sin (1/x) has limit 00 at 00 even though sin⁡(1/x)\sin (1/x) has no limit there. The product law cannot show that, and a different theorem is needed.

Quotient law with a nonzero limiting denominator

Definition If in addition M≠0M \neq 0, then

lim⁡x→af(x)g(x)=LM.\lim_{x \to a} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = \frac{L}{M}.

When M≠0M \neq 0, the function gg is automatically nonzero for all x≠ax \neq a close enough to aa, so the quotient is defined there. When M=0M = 0 the law does not apply, and the limit may exist or not.

In plain words Divide the limits, but only when the bottom limit is not zero.

Example The denominator tends to 2≠02 \neq 0, so

lim⁡x→3x2+1x−1=102=5.\lim_{x \to 3} \frac{x^2 + 1}{x - 1} = \frac{10}{2} = 5.

Compare two cases with M=0M = 0. For (x2−9)/(x−3)(x^2 - 9)/(x - 3) at 33 the limit is 66 after cancelling, while 1/x1/x at 00 has no limit at all. The law gives neither answer.

Power law

Definition For every positive integer nn,

lim⁡x→a(f(x))n=Ln.\lim_{x \to a} \bigl(f(x)\bigr)^n = L^n.

This follows from the product law applied n−1n - 1 times. Together with lim⁡x→ax=a\lim_{x \to a} x = a it gives lim⁡x→axn=an\lim_{x \to a} x^n = a^n.

In plain words Raise the limit to the same power.

Example The base 3x−43x - 4 tends to 22 as x→2x \to 2, so

lim⁡x→2(3x−4)5=25=32.\lim_{x \to 2} (3x - 4)^5 = 2^5 = 32.

Root law and real-domain conditions

Definition Let nn be a positive integer. If nn is odd, then

lim⁡x→af(x)n=Ln.\lim_{x \to a} \sqrt[n]{f(x)} = \sqrt[n]{L}.

If nn is even, the same holds provided f(x)≥0f(x) \ge 0 for all x≠ax \neq a in some open interval around aa, so that the root is a real number there. That condition forces L≥0L \ge 0. It holds automatically when L>0L > 0, because then f(x)f(x) is close to the positive number LL, and so positive, for xx near aa. When L=0L = 0 it has to be checked.

In plain words Take the root of the limit. For square roots and other even roots, make sure you are never taking the root of a negative number near aa.

Example The insides tend to 25>025 > 0 and 88, so

lim⁡x→4x2+9=25=5andlim⁡x→−3x2−13=83=2.\lim_{x \to 4} \sqrt{x^2 + 9} = \sqrt{25} = 5 \quad \text{and} \quad \lim_{x \to -3} \sqrt[3]{x^2 - 1} = \sqrt[3]{8} = 2.

By contrast, −x2\sqrt{-x^2} is a real number only at x=0x = 0, so it has no limit at 00 in the real numbers, even though −x2→0-x^2 \to 0.

Proof of a limit law

Definition Here is the proof of the sum law. Let ε>0\varepsilon > 0. Since f(x)→Lf(x) \to L, there is δ1>0\delta_1 > 0 with ∣f(x)−L∣<ε/2\lvert f(x) - L \rvert < \varepsilon/2 whenever 0<∣x−a∣<δ10 < \lvert x - a \rvert < \delta_1. Since g(x)→Mg(x) \to M, there is δ2>0\delta_2 > 0 with ∣g(x)−M∣<ε/2\lvert g(x) - M \rvert < \varepsilon/2 whenever 0<∣x−a∣<δ20 < \lvert x - a \rvert < \delta_2. Let δ=min⁡(δ1,δ2)\delta = \min(\delta_1, \delta_2). If 0<∣x−a∣<δ0 < \lvert x - a \rvert < \delta, the triangle inequality gives

∣(f(x)+g(x))−(L+M)∣≤∣f(x)−L∣+∣g(x)−M∣<ε2+ε2=ε.\lvert (f(x) + g(x)) - (L + M) \rvert \le \lvert f(x) - L \rvert + \lvert g(x) - M \rvert < \frac{\varepsilon}{2} + \frac{\varepsilon}{2} = \varepsilon.

In plain words Split the error budget in half, give each function its share, and use the smaller of the two δ\delta values so both promises hold at once.

Example The constant multiple law has a similar proof. If c=0c = 0 both sides are 00. If c≠0c \neq 0, let ε>0\varepsilon > 0 and pick δ>0\delta > 0 so that ∣f(x)−L∣<ε/∣c∣\lvert f(x) - L \rvert < \varepsilon / \lvert c \rvert whenever 0<∣x−a∣<δ0 < \lvert x - a \rvert < \delta. Then for those xx

∣cf(x)−cL∣=∣c∣ ∣f(x)−L∣<∣c∣⋅ε∣c∣=ε.\lvert c f(x) - cL \rvert = \lvert c \rvert \, \lvert f(x) - L \rvert < \lvert c \rvert \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\lvert c \rvert} = \varepsilon.

Check yourself

  1. Suppose lim⁡x→af(x)=4\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = 4 and lim⁡x→ag(x)=−2\lim_{x \to a} g(x) = -2. Find the limit
lim⁡x→a3f(x)−g(x)2f(x)+g(x).\lim_{x \to a} \frac{3f(x) - g(x)^2}{f(x) + g(x)}.
Show the answer

The numerator tends to 12−4=812 - 4 = 8 and the denominator to 2≠02 \neq 0, so the limit is 8/2=48/2 = 4.

  1. Find lim⁡x→1x3+7x3\lim_{x \to 1} \sqrt[3]{x^3 + 7x}.
Show the answer

The inside tends to 1+7=81 + 7 = 8, and the cube root law needs no sign condition, so the limit is 83=2\sqrt[3]{8} = 2.

  1. Why can the quotient law not be used directly for the limit below, and what is the limit?
lim⁡x→1x2−1x−1\lim_{x \to 1} \frac{x^2 - 1}{x - 1}
Show the answer

The denominator tends to 00, so the condition M≠0M \neq 0 fails. For x≠1x \neq 1 the quotient equals x+1x + 1, so the limit is 22.

How this lesson connects

It also uses algebra.