Apply the fundamental theorem blindly to on and you get
A positive function with a negative area is a clear sign something went wrong. The integrand is unbounded at , so the ordinary definite integral does not apply. This page handles integrands that blow up, and gives tests that decide convergence when no antiderivative is available.
Key terms
Unbounded integrands
Definition Let be continuous on and unbounded near . Then
provided the limit exists as a finite number, in which case the integral converges. Otherwise it diverges. Likewise, if is continuous on and unbounded near , then
with the same meaning of convergence. For powers,
In plain words Stop just short of the bad point, integrate, then let the stopping point slide toward it. Near zero, powers are the reverse of the tail case. Mild blow up such as is fine, and or anything worse is not.
Example For on the partial integrals are
so the integral converges to , matching the formula with .
Endpoint and interior singularities
Definition Let be continuous on except at one point with , where it is unbounded. Then
and the left side converges only if both improper integrals on the right converge. A singularity at an endpoint needs one limit. A singularity inside the interval needs a split and two limits.
In plain words Always look for points inside the interval where the integrand is undefined or blows up. Applying the fundamental theorem across such a point gives nonsense.
Example For on split at . The right half has partial integrals
One half diverges, so the whole integral diverges. The value from the opening paragraph is wrong.
Separate limits
Definition When an integral is improper for more than one reason, such as singularities at both endpoints, or a singularity together with an infinite interval, choose points that split it into pieces with exactly one improper feature each. The integral converges if and only if every piece converges, each through its own independent limit, and the value is the sum of the pieces. The result does not depend on where you split.
In plain words One limit per problem spot. Never let two limits share a single variable, because that can hide a divergence by cancellation.
Example The integral
is improper at and at . Split at . An antiderivative is , as you can check with . Then
Both converge, so the integral equals .
Direct comparison test
Definition Let and be continuous on with for all .
- If converges, then converges.
- If diverges, then diverges.
The same holds for integrals over or with a singularity at an endpoint, when on that interval.
In plain words A nonnegative function sitting under one with finite area also has finite area. A function sitting above one with infinite area also has infinite area. The test says nothing if sits below a function with infinite area, or sits above one with finite area.
Example For you have , so . The larger function has a convergent integral, so
and the integral of converges. No antiderivative was needed.
Limit comparison test
Definition Let and be continuous and positive on , and suppose
Then the integrals of and over either both converge or both diverge. For functions continuous and positive on with a singularity at , the same conclusion holds with the limit taken as , and similarly at a left endpoint.
In plain words If two positive functions behave alike far out, up to a constant factor, their tails share the same fate. Pick as the simplest function with the same leading behavior.
Example For on compare with . The ratio is
The p-integral of over converges, so the integral of over converges too.
Absolute and conditional convergence
Definition Let be continuous on . The improper integral of over converges absolutely if
converges. Absolute convergence implies convergence, and then
The integral converges conditionally if it converges but the integral of diverges. The same definitions apply to integrals with singularities.
In plain words The comparison tests need nonnegative functions. For a function that changes sign, apply them to . If that converges, you are done. If not, the integral might still converge thanks to cancellation, and that is the conditional case.
Example For the bound
holds, so the integral of over converges absolutely. In contrast, the integral of over converges only conditionally. Integration by parts gives
and the right side has a limit as , since and the last integral converges absolutely. Yet , so for
The integral of over diverges, because the integral of diverges while the integral of converges by the same parts argument. Direct comparison then shows that the integral of over diverges.
Check yourself
- Evaluate .
Show the answer
The singularity is at , inside the interval, so split there. An antiderivative is . The left piece is and the right piece is , both found as limits at . The integral converges to .
- Evaluate .
Show the answer
For the partial integral is
As , , so the integral equals .
- Does converge?
Show the answer
No. Since , the integrand is at least , and the integral of over diverges. By direct comparison the integral diverges.