To find out whether a messy series converges, you rarely need its exact sum. It is enough to set it beside a simpler series whose behavior you know, such as a geometric series or a p-series. If your series is smaller than a convergent one, it converges. If it is bigger than a divergent one, it diverges. These tests make that comparison precise.
Key terms
Series with nonnegative terms
Definition If for all , the partial sums form an increasing sequence. By the monotone convergence theorem, converges if and only if its partial sums are bounded above. Otherwise .
In plain words When you only ever add nonnegative numbers, the total can only grow. It either levels off below some ceiling or it grows without bound. There is no third option.
Example For note that for , since is a product of factors that are at least (and a factor ). So
The partial sums are increasing and bounded, so the series converges. Its sum is .
Direct comparison test
Definition Suppose for all .
- If converges, then converges, and .
- If diverges, then diverges.
In plain words Below a convergent series is safe. Above a divergent series is lost. Being below a divergent series or above a convergent one tells you nothing.
Example For we have
and converges, so converges. In the other direction, for because , and the harmonic series diverges, so diverges.
Eventual inequalities
Definition In both comparison tests it is enough that the hypotheses hold for all for some integer . This follows because finitely many terms do not affect convergence.
In plain words The inequality only has to be true from some point on. Early terms that break it can be ignored.
Example Consider , whose terms are positive since . When , that is , we have , so
The geometric series converges, so the given series converges. The term breaks nothing.
Limit comparison test
Definition Suppose and for all , and
Then and either both converge or both diverge.
In plain words If two positive sequences are eventually proportional, their series share the same fate. You do not need to fight with exact inequalities, only find the dominant part of .
Example Consider . Its terms are positive for , and for large they look like . Compare with .
Since and converges, the given series converges.
The zero and infinite ratio cases
Definition Suppose and for all .
- If and converges, then converges.
- If and diverges, then diverges.
In the other two combinations, ratio with divergent or ratio with convergent, no conclusion follows.
In plain words A ratio of means is eventually much smaller than , which only helps if converges. A ratio of means is much bigger, which only helps if diverges.
Example For compare with the convergent .
so converges. For compare with the divergent harmonic series. The ratio is
so diverges.
Check yourself
- Does converge?
Show the answer
Yes. Since , the terms satisfy
and converges, so direct comparison applies.
- Does converge?
Show the answer
No. Compare with . The ratio is , and the harmonic series diverges, so this series diverges too.
- Why does comparing with through prove nothing?
Show the answer
Being smaller than a divergent series gives no information. Compare with instead, which shows convergence.